Talk:Mego (label)

Suggested merge
It has been suggested that Editions Mego be merged into this page. Please discuss this merger here. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihon joe 16:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree with the merger, as it's still the same people, the same artists... and both articles are still quite thin in terms of content. H9x (talk) 22:49, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree with the merger. Editions Mego was created to basically "carry on" the releases Mego itself had. What I'm most interested in (and I'm not sure if anyone knows), why was the original Mego shut down by Pita? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Utopiantheorist (talk • contribs) 03:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with the merger. Editions Mego, while carrying on the legacy of the old Mego label is a different entry, different company. For the record, Pita did not shut down the original Mego. The other two partners left due to various reasons (mainly loss of interest in the running of label), which more or less meant the end of the company. Peter Rehberg wanted to carry on, and decided on the slight name change to make the point clear that things had changed, hopefully for the better Prehberg (talk) 16:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with the merger based on on the Prehberg info above. Valueyou (talk) 08:55, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Bug in how Wikipedia shows Discogs links
I've just added
 * => Discogs label|Editions Mego shows as Mego : incorrect, should be shown as Editions Mego
 * => Discogs label|Mego shows as Mego : correct

So that's a bug that needs to be flagged elsewhere I presume.

Quick fix on this page : 80.236.216.92 (talk) 11:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * > Editions Mego
 * > Mego