Talk:Melaleuca, Inc. v. Hansen

Untitled
First Peer Review Suggestions

A couple of substantive edits that I did not make (for fear of changing the meaning of the text beyond what the author intended):

1) It is a little unclear which opinion is being referred to in the introduction section - the text talks about the CAN-SPAM decision, but the reference is to the later opinion which seemed to be primarily about collateral estoppel

2) The significance section could be clearer about how this is building on Gordon v. Virtumundo (or is it just applying it?)

(Great job, though Lilylolo! I thought it was very informative and concise!)

Jk214 (talk) 09:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program&#32;during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)