Talk:Melbourne School of Continental Philosophy

Untitled
Since the wikipedia notice went up describing this entry as an advertisement, I have made a number of changes to it. First and foremost, I have added references from third party, verifiable sources, to ground the claims made in the article; secondly, I have tidied up the writing style in an attempt to bring it in line with wikipedia's standards.

Between these two changes, I hope that the problem is moving towards a resolution. By adding substantial references I hope to ground the claims which might otherwise be viewed as subjective. If there are still problems with the article, I would like to know how I can get feedback from a wikipedia editor. Cheers. Prdaniels 14:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC)prdaniels

comment
I have decline to delete the article, as it seems primarily descriptive. I have removed some further programmatic statements. I have also removed some of what I consider excessive tagging, as normally WP accepts the official website for uncontroversial internal history. If any of the statements are actually controversial, they should be discussed on this talk page. DGG (talk) 18:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)