Talk:Melbourne bus route 901

Notability Assement (if you want to update copy this one and make a change do not delete this one though, if you disagree please state you do so and give reasons)
Assement of Anylysis-

Only 2 sources fullfill the notability guide, out of 9, 1 more source is reliable however does not have significant coverage needs 1 or 2 more sources that fullfill the notability guide to be considerd notable NotOrrio (talk) 05:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Notability Assement 2 (if you want to update copy this one and make a change do not delete this one though, if you disagree please state you do so and give reasons)
Assement of Anylysis- 3 Sources fullfill the notability guide 1 timetable, 1 map and 1 article, based on the fact that 3 different types of sources fullfill the guide its safe to say the article is notable

Assement of Anylysis- Only one source potentially satisfies the requirements of being significant coverage in an independent secondary source. Timetables and maps are evidence that the bus route exists but are not considered significant coverage for the purposes of establishing notability. Based on the above the draft clearly does not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Dan arndt (talk) 04:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)