Talk:Melford Stevenson/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Diannaa (talk · contribs) 01:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
 * "Stevenson was Sir Reginald Manningham-Buller's number two" - I am unclear on the meaning here. Could you elaborate what a number two is, or what their responsibilities are?
 * " It has been said that the prosecution might have had a better chance..." Can this be re-worded, so it is clearer who said it? I can't access the source.
 * B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * Layout is good; referencing nicely done; lead meets requirements. I also checked for dabs.
 * A. Provides references to all sources:
 * Spot checks reveal no overly close paraphrasing or copy vio; material in the sources backs up the material in the article. I also ran Checklinks to look for dead links and looked for referencing errors; no problems were found.
 * B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * All direct quotations have footnotes.
 * C. No original research:
 * Opinions are those expressed in the sources.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Main aspects are addressed:
 * B. Remains focused:
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * I've done some rewriting to address your concerns, see what you think. Malleus Fatuorum 02:48, 29 July 2012 (UTC)


 * That's much better, and now meets all the GA criterion. Well done, Malleus. Did the man have any hobbies or interests outside of work? Not a GA requirement, but something to think about for FA if any supporting material can be found. Best wishes, -- Dianna (talk) 13:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)