Talk:Melophagus rupicaprinus

My edits
Why are you reverting? 1. All sections should be complete sentences. A single word does not a section make. If the sentence is very short, it doesn't deserve a section. 2. fly is redundant. 3. Taxoboxes should typically use the default ranks display and only show additional ranks when needing to show intermediary ranks from the article's top-most rank to the next major rank. As this is a species article, the next major rank is genus. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * What is wrong with what I have? Please revert back to my version. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I could ask the very same question about your edits? Why do think your edits are superior? In my view, they seem to read like a child's work, rather than encyclopedic. Simuliid (talk) 17:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I stated above. We are an encyclopedia, not a catalogue. We should use complete sentences, not a one word entry in a section. If you want it to read better, write more. If you are only complaining about the Distribution section, why did you undo my other changes? - UtherSRG (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If my edits are so unliked, maybe I should give my valuable time elsewhere, And not on Wikipedia Simuliid (talk) 23:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That's not what I said. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)