Talk:Mendeley

POV language
Re: 23:57, 20 November 2009 134.95.82.182 (talk) (5,142 bytes) (Remove Non-NPOV 'Known Bugs' section)--Have deleted word "nasty" and the exclamation point. What remains is a fact, not a point of view. This was posted out of sympathy for MS Word users who cannot discover why their text box feature stopped working since this software was installed. Proyster (talk) 01:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Developmental time line section
Why is the "Developmental time line" section part of the main article? What does it add that wikipedia users need to know? --159.178.249.176 (talk) 14:16, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

History section
What is the relevance of this line: "On August 2011, a similar service was launched by the University of Warwick, called Piirus." --This appears to be a completely different type of service (website aimed at networking). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.109.200 (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Advertisement
This article reads a bit like an advertisement with features, awards, and other such things. It needs a re-write to get it into encyclopaedic style. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.242.196.123 (talk) 15:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mendeley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130524065302/http://www.mysciencework.com/en/ to http://www.mysciencework.com/en/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Suggested update
Hi, I'd like to suggest removing the section "Vendor lock-in controversy" (and also the third paragraph of the intro which exactly duplicates this text), or at least tone it down as it currently makes the situation sound more dramatic than is necessary. The issue is clearly explained here: https://blog.mendeley.com/2019/01/31/the-importance-of-interoperability as being a technical error, which has since been rectified. It is still simple for users to export their libraries to Zotero, so nobody is locked-in. The existing text is factually incorrect, and sourced to Zotero (a competitor of Mendeley).

Can you please let me know your thoughts on whether this would be a suitable change to make? I work for RELX, but I'm suggesting this update in good faith - it doesn't seem to make for an accurate article at the moment. Ryoba (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

The Impact of QuillBot to the Writing Skills of BEEd Students
The Impact of QuillBot to the Writing Skills of BEEd Students 110.54.160.228 (talk) 01:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)