Talk:Mercedes F1 W06 Hybrid/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: F1foreverF1 (talk · contribs) 03:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Images: Pass - Suitable licensing for all images. Images in this article are from various sources.
 * Perhaps the section on Design and development has one or two images.

Stable: Pass - very few edits in recent history.

Neutral: Pass - no dubious opinions evident.

Broad coverage: Pass - covers most things I would expect to see.
 * It was worth providing Competitiveness and performance context to see how the car compared to its competitors.
 * Season summary section was well elaborated with sources cited.

Factually accurate and verifiable: Pass - Appears thoroughly referenced to high quality sources
 * Content matches with the high quality sources.

Well-written: On hold Basically fine.
 * Design and development could elaborated further to improve the article.

Overall: Pass Nothing major, but some minor tweaks.


 * Please read my comment on the articles talk page. This article is far from being GA, especially concerning the "Broad coverage" criterium. I would strongly recommend not to pass this review (which you do not appear to have done yet even though you wrote "pass" here). Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * As I was advised to do, I'll be bold and close this review. Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)