Talk:Mereological essentialism

I don´t agree that the remark about an increduolus stare at the defender of mereological essentialism  is a overly biased sentence. The point is that ME is considered as a too absurd position, but if it has other theoretical benefits it should be defended. The situation is the same as with David Lewis´ defence of concrete possible worlds. The increduolus stare attitude is, for instance, defended, not explicitly, by Peter van Inwagen and Trenton Merricks. RickardV 10:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mereological essentialism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070626201136/http://marksteen.googlepages.com/BO_OO_and_ME.pdf to http://marksteen.googlepages.com/BO_OO_and_ME.pdf
 * Added tag to http://www.shef.ac.uk/content/1/c6/03/49/16/Par.Increase.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)