Talk:Merging Technologies

Notability
There's little evidence in this draft that the subject meets WP:NCORP. Many of the sources are not WP:INDEPENDENT as they are published by the company or its partners or are derived directly from press releases. There is some WP:RELIABLE coverage of specific products cited but there is not WP:SIGCOV of the company in these sources so these don't contribute to establishing the notability of the company (see WP:INHERIT).

Sorry for the bad news here. Wikipedia accepts articles on companies where sufficient information is available from WP:SECONDARY sources from which to create a fair and balanced treatment of the subject. ~Kvng (talk) 02:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

WP:THREE
The author of this draft (User:Nicowiki~enwiki) asserts that the WP:THREE best sources are: 1 and 3 do not clearly have WP:SIGCOV of the company and 2 doesn't have a byline so its providence deserves scrutiny; I was unable to find anything stinky in a quick search.
 * 1) https://www.proaudio.de/de/news/broadcast/23992-remote-sports-production-enabled-by-merging-technologies.html
 * 2) https://www.pme.ch/entreprises/2020/08/31/linvincible-genie-suisse-laudio
 * 3) https://www.aes.org/events/145/presenters/?ID=7812

This is, at best, a borderline situation and, since there is a WP:COI in play here, we need to get above borderline here. ~Kvng (talk) 14:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Article has been improved and demonstrates notability based on, ,. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Professional_sound_production (or appropriate archive) for discussion. ~Kvng (talk) 14:48, 14 July 2022 (UTC)