Talk:Merrick Garland/Archive 2

Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2021
Can someone please revert this? [] It was properly sourced and...pretty damn important. From the NYT nonetheless. No reason was given for the deletion of reliably-sourced material, which is improper. I don't see how this is a WP:BLP issue. Reliably sourced, notable, fairly neutral tone. Many Wikipedia readers are Americans and the potential weaponization of the PATRIOT Act by their own government against them would be, like, important information for them to know...that's what Wikipedia is about, being an encyclopedia and all. 2600:1012:B00B:8F38:7057:8038:50CC:5043 (talk) 07:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template. Edit requests are not for edit warring. Please establish a consensus about this prose. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:47, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Dead beat dad's!!! Politicians and there effects.
1.Where did shame and blame politics come from? 2. How do phycological attacks work? 3. Can anyone "blame and shame" and cause these satisfacted effects? 4. Can a person in such a high level position be hung by the United Nations for an attack on the American public with this "weapon of mass destruction"? 173.219.33.98 (talk) 10:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Strong arm law!
Was that because black fathers could not find work due to racism? I do not believe the caricature of the lawyer nor the dignity of the court was represented. I would like to address this in federal court. 173.219.33.117 (talk) 20:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

No mention of Mar-a- Lago?
Zero mention of Mar-a-Lago search on Trumps documents? Eruditess (talk) 21:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Unprecedented
The article incorrectly says that the senate delaying his hearing was unprecedented. However the majority of the time this situation has arisen in the past the same thing was done. This incorrect and biased word needs to be removed and replaced with a reference to the other situations which set the precedent that was followed in his case. 2001:5B0:2842:DDB8:420:1503:5841:FC4F (talk) 22:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "Delaying" is the wrong word. There was no hearing at all, for over half a year. What precedent is there for that? BD2412  T 00:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

NOT the President's "personal attorney"!!!
Garland is Attorney General. His client is the United States, and NOT Joe Biden, except in his ceremonial role as head of the government of the United States. Shame on whoever allowed the edit claiming otherwise. 98.45.240.11 (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Consider Page Protection
Since Garland is currently a hot topic amongst conspiracy theorists and revolutionary cosplayers in the aftermath of the contempt of court vote along party-lines by the house of representatives, it may be worth considering protecting this article from further vandalism.
 * I just posted a report to the biography of living persons noticeboard to bring this issue to attention there. Red Shogun412 (talk) 02:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)