Talk:Messengers 2: The Scarecrow

Not a Prequel
Messengers 2: The Scarecrow is always misrepresented as a prequel when it is not. Todd Farmer has been quoted in interviews more than once that Messengers 2 is his original story (See ) and that The Messengers is a re-written adaptation of that story; they are in to way related directly to each other and merely share a common character with a completely different story arc in each film. I would think in the interest of accuracy that this should be noted along with all prequel references removed on both pages.Malagant (talk) 10:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Since The Messengers came out before it, and this story is about the events that occured prior to the original, then this serves as a prequel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.55.170.113 (talk) 04:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree it should not be called a prequel as the events in this movie do not correspond easily with the events in the first movie; I would imagine that if they do correlate, there would be more ghosts in the first film than those who appeared.Twizzar (talk) 00:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Messengers 2: The Scarecrow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090401193901/http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/11012 to http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/11012

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)