Talk:MetaTexis

The MetaTexis entry is quite like the Wordfast entry. Both the structure and way of presentation is quite similar. Both software products are in the same market area, have the same user target group. So why would the Wordfast entry be OK, while the MetaTexis article is not OK? If you delete the MetaTexis entry, you would also have to delete the Wordfast entry.--155.56.68.215 (talk) 08:11, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

In the German Wikipedia there was a similar discussion about the relevance of the MetaTexis entry. Eventually, it was decided by the German admins that the MetaTexis entry is relevant. So, you now find the MetaTexis entry in the German Wikipedia, see http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/MetaTexis. If the MetaTexis entry is in the German Wikipedia, why should it not also be in the English Wikipedia?--Hcbruns (talk) 14:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MetaTexis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029192844/http://www.bdue.de/appends/mdue/Leseprobe_aus_MDUE_5_2011.pdf to http://www.bdue.de/appends/mdue/Leseprobe_aus_MDUE_5_2011.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MetaTexis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120620234231/http://traduccion.rediris.es/8/2articulos.htm to http://traduccion.rediris.es/8/2articulos.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

The Mysterious Matter of the Missing CafeTran
I don't know how much of this you may have been following, but there are strange powers at work here on Wikipedia. For several years now, people have been trying to create a page for CafeTran. However, no matter what people do, the page is blocked every step of the way. Now, I know that if you are a professional translator, you will probably have heard of CafeTran by now. Hell, Proz.com, the largest platform for translators in the world offers it for free now as part of their Plus Package!

Anyway, the Wikipedia goblins have since removed ALL traces of all the hard work that we but into trying to create a page for CafeTran. Have a look at what is left:


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cafetran_Espresso
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cafetran_Espresso

Then go to:

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_computer-assisted_translation_tools

… and look at all the CAT tool that ARE allowed to have their own pages:


 * Across (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Across_Language_Server)
 * Crowdin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdin)
 * Déjà Vu (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9j%C3%A0_Vu_(software))
 * GlobalSight (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GlobalSight)
 * Gtranslator (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gtranslator)
 * MateCat (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MateCat)
 * memoQ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MemoQ)
 * MetaTexis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MetaTexis)
 * OmegaT (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OmegaT)
 * Open Language Tools (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Language_Tools)
 * Phrase (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrase_(software))
 * Poedit (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poedit)
 * Pootle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pootle)
 * SDL Trados Studio (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SDL_Trados_Studio)
 * SmartCat (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SmartCAT)
 * Virtaal (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtaal)
 * Wordfast (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wordfast)

What on earth is going on here?

If CafeTran is not ‘notable’ (I think that was their main reason for now allowing a page about it), then it would stand to reason that most of the above CAT tool articles should also be deleted, right?

MichaelBeijer (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)