Talk:Metacarcinus

A valid genus?
Doesn't it seem premature to accept this generic designation? In particular, this designation by Ng et al. is not supported by the molecular study of Harrison. So, I suggest reversion back to its previous sub-genus status (cf. Nations, 1975). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.211.24.221 (talk) 23:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Metacarcinus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606061453/http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s17/s17rbz.pdf to http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s17/s17rbz.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606064728/http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s21/s21rbz1-109.pdf to http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s21/s21rbz1-109.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)