Talk:Metallica (album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Petergriffin9901 (talk • message • contribs • count  • [/wiki/Special:Log?user= logs ] • email)

Fail - This article is being quick failed for obvious lack of preparation for GA. I appreciate the effort, but this article is barely a C-class. Its in need of major clean-up and expansion. Good luck with that.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   01:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Many unreliable sources; #s 7, 8, 30, 42
 * All are missing accessdates, and the ones that have them, are inconsistent
 * Many are in numerical form, while some appear 03-12-02 style
 * All sources are poorly and inconsistently formatted; many missing works/publishers/dates/authors etc.
 * Many MoS violations and poor and awkward paragraphing
 * Whats with the source for the credits? Make it encyclopedic.
 * Major lack of content; this is one of their most definitive albums, yet you have three major reviews? I could get more for a Kesha album
 * Very Bias article, struggling with NPOV issues; "Rolling Stone delivered a perfect 5-star review" -> we aren't fools, you don't need to tell us perfect
 * The tours section seems like a comulative piece of information regarding several tours and albums throughout the years. Nothing to the point or relevant
 * The lead is, forgive me, poor. Instead of failry summarizing the entire article's contents, it lists its commercial achievements and nothing more