Talk:Meteorological history of Cyclone Leon–Eline

Merge?
I know I split it from the main article, but this is only 16.7 kb, and the main article is only 58.3 kb (including two paragraphs of MH). I don't think this separate MH article is needed, especially as some of the info in "statistics" is repeated as well. Merge? ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I won't object, but it could go either way. The merger would bring the main article up to around 47kb/4200 words of readable prose, which is close to the threshold set by WP:SIZERULE (50kb/4000 words) for when page size begins to justify sub-articles. Plus, I dig the novelty of a SHEM met/hist page. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 20:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm leaning toward keeping this article. Its status as a tropical cyclone for 29 days (with plenty of intensity changes along the way) definitely satisfies notability for Leon-Eline to have its own MH article. Couple that with the size issue JC brought up, and the fact that this article is already well written, and I see no reason to push it back into the main article. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 20:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you both for the feedback. I intend to take the main article to FAC, and I had a flashback to Hurricane Kyle (2002), where the MH was an issue, so the MH article was created, only to be merged later. I want it to be in the (roughly) final take when I do FA nom the main article. I withdraw the merge proposal then. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Support – No serious size issues presented by a merger. Additionally, merging the two articles would bring everything together in one place, which would make things more convenient for readers.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 22:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)