Talk:Methuselah (vampire)

«Articles on a work of fiction (a book, movie, television series, video game, or other medium) should demonstrate notability by citing critical reception, viewings or sales figures, development and other information from reliable sources. Such sources can include creators' commentary and interviews regarding the work or topic, bearing in mind the restrictions if the work is self-published. »


 * http://www.ccpgames.com/press/press_releases.asp?pressReleaseID=26 (about the importance of White Wolf and Vampire)
 * http://tv.ign.com/articles/755/755556p1.html (refers methuselahs)
 * http://www.experiencefestival.com/crusniks (idem)
 * http://www.activeanime.com/html/content/view/2475/36/ (idem)
 * http://www.writing.com/main/view_item/item_id/1056824 (idem)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_Blood (idem, but on wikipedia itself)

.

Methuselahs are important characters on different products from White Wolf, each of them notable by itself: RPGs, Novels, Card Games. I have no relation whatsoever with white wolf, besides enjoying some of the RPGs they make (I haven't read the novels or played the cards, although I know people who have done and still do both).

"Methuselahs", in this context, is as important as "Antideluvians" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antediluvians_%28World_of_Darkness%29 ) and there's an article in wikipedia about them which rightfully wasn't considered unnotable)

I do not think this article deserves the "in universe" tag either, because I do an introductory paragraph where I explain the nature of the context where it fits. I do believe that different articles on this kind of topics are written this way, and so they should. Se for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malkavian ; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbat_%28World_of_Darkness%29 ; or even http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darth_vader