Talk:Metropolitan Council (Minnesota)

Important Article
OK so MN Project ranked it mid but I think the Met Council is pretty darn important. The work they do is underneath what most people know or see and cities on the fringe are at the mercy of the Met Council's decision to service them or not. Tho I can see where today MC doesn't have nearly as much power as in the past since its politically appointed. Anyway, I'll be doing more to improve this article but I thought I'd note attention to it..:DavuMaya:. 17:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Metropolitan Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120064148/http://www.metrocouncil.org/Directions/transit/transit2006/transitcentersFeb06.htm to http://www.metrocouncil.org/Directions/transit/transit2006/transitcentersFeb06.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718195946/https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/constitution/MN-Constitution.pdf to https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/constitution/MN-Constitution.pdf/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070804223800/http://www.metrocouncil.org/services/livcomm.htm to http://www.metrocouncil.org/services/livcomm.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 31 January 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   16:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

– I don't see evidence that the Minnesotan council is the primary topic for the title over all the others. Only the first two results of my google searches relate to it (and one of those is this article) with the other hits on the first page being related to different councils (e.g. Kirklees Metropolitan Council features prominently). All the entries on the disambiguation page (and all the other councils that could also be listed there if it was a complete list of all Metropolitan councils, e.g. West Yorkshire Metropolitan Council, Delhi Metropolitan Council, Seoul Metropolitan Council) use an uppercase "C" so the disambiguation should be at the base title with that capitalisation. Thryduulf (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Metropolitan Council → Metropolitan Council (Minnesota)
 * Metropolitan council → Metropolitan Council
 * Support even from England the Minnesota council comes up first though the rest of the results are for the English councils. However the Minnesota one has 512 views but Metropolitan Council of Nashville and Davidson County has 368[|Metropolitan_Council_of_Nashville_and_Davidson_County] which seems close enough especially given all the others without separate articles and the generic meanings per WP:DIFFCAPS.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 17:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Support. There is no reason why this generic term should go solely to the entity in Minnesota. Kablammo (talk) 12:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Support for the reasons above. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)