Talk:Mi Reflejo/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 10:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
 * Lead
 * The tracks adapted and composed → The tracks were adapted and composed
 * on top of both charts. → at the top of both charts
 * platinum in country. → platinum in that country
 * It also peaked at number fifty-four in Switzerland and certified double platinum in Mexico. → I don't think this is needed tbh, plus it's a bit odd to say it peaked at 54 in Switzerland and certified double platinum in Mexico in that construction.
 * Need a comma after Nielsen SoundScan

✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅
 * Background
 * After the huge success → By including 'huge' here, it sounds a bit WP:FANCRUFT and fan like. 'After the success' has the same impact without reading like a forum
 * found themselves pushing → Well, I doubt it's something they didn't want! Simply 'pushed' would do fine.
 * These opening sentences aren't making sense. I have changed it, because it just isn't flowing and it's easier for me to do this myself than explain each bit
 * markets also, the grow in the → markets also. The growth in the
 * something in which → something which


 * Composition
 * The former single peaked at number thirteen on the Billboard Hot Latin Songs chart while the latter single peaked at number six on the Hot Latin Songs and number two on the Billboard Latin Pop Songs chart. → This isn't composition and should be removed, it should go in the Singles section. (I haven't got that bit yet, so you might be repeating yourself).
 * Since they're weren't released as singles for this album, it wouldn't be appropriate for to the singles section.
 * They were previously released as single though. Composition is the complete wrong section. Chart positions have nothing to do with composition. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   09:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

✅
 * and including a system → and included a system

✅
 * Commercial performance
 * chart succeeded → chart and replaced (I think this is what you mean)

✅
 * Track listing
 * What's the point of the Music column?

I made some amendments and MOS changes.
 * Charts
 * Thanks! :)


 * References
 * Look great :)
 * Again, thanks! :)

On hold. — AARON  &bull; TALK   21:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Status
 * Thanks for the review! Sorry about the delay, college has been keeping me busy. Erick (talk) 06:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I believe I've addressed every issue brought up. EDIT: What the heck? My edit didn't save. =\ Give me one minute. EDIT2: Okay, I've got it this time. Erick (talk) 03:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay. Passing. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   09:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)