Talk:Mian–Chowla sequence

Explain it Better
This is an extremely poor explanation. The article should be rewritten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.221.29.97 (talk) 23:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, I think that is an extremely poor assessment and you should rewrite your criticism. Why is it a poor explanation? Is this a topic you learnt from another source and you find a specific flaw with the way it is explained here? Or is the topic something you don't already know and which after having read the entire article you still don't understand? Or is there another problem I haven't identified? CompositeFan (talk) 19:36, 30 June 2008 (UTC)