Talk:Michèle Fitoussi

Restoration of unsourced material is being treated as simple vandalism
This has to stop. If it's "sourceable", then source it. Otherwise, restoration of unsourced material is vandalism, it's as simple as that. Unit Anode  17:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That kind of comment is not worthy of a response. Please don't delete verifiable content on your novel pet theories about sourcing methods.  - Wikidemon (talk) 17:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Please do not insert unverified content after it has been removed. Either source it, or leave it out. ++Lar: t/c 18:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, no. That is not how Wikipedia works.  You are an administrator.  Please deal with abusive behavior here, and stop throwing your weight around to advance your content position.  - Wikidemon (talk) 18:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Policy is clear. Removing unsourced material is allowed, in fact encouraged. REinserting it after removal is disruptive. I'm not sure it's all the way to "abusive" unless it's a repeated pattern of behavior. That's not "throwing weight around", nor is it "advancing a content position". I think you are much mistaken but this is not the place to debate the general case. ++Lar: t/c 22:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)