Talk:Michael A. Monsoor/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * Not Yet
 * 1) Please explain the significance of the Valor Device on his Bronze Star somewhere in the article, to differentiate it from a peacetime Bronze Star.
 * Done. I added it as a footnote. --Kumioko (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * 2) "He entered Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL training but had to drop out because of an injury" - needs a ref.
 * Done. I couldn't find were it came from so I removed it for now. --Kumioko (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) "He later reentered and graduated from Class 250 on September 2, 2004 as one of the top performers in his class." - needs a ref.
 * Done. --Kumioko (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) Overall:
 * On Hold to address issues. — Ed! (talk) 03:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * All right, the article now meets the GA criteria according to my interpretation of them. Well done. — Ed! (talk) 23:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)