Talk:Michael Cammalleri/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * very good and easy prose
 * there should be more information about his religiosity; does he practice Jewish traditions? Or is he more liberal?
 * Sources conflict on this point. The "Cammalleri is Jewish" opening line is not my addition but I realize that it isn't going anywhere without an edit war. one source says he observes Jewish holidays. Another says he was raised secular. A third gives no indication of the importance of religion in his life.  Lacking a consistent message, I prefer to leave the section as is. Resolute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * the "by whom" tag in the last picture's and the playing style section should be resolved.
 * Reworded for clarity. Resolute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * high-quality sources
 * overall good reference formatting, but the dates were inconsistent, so I changed to classic mdy format.
 * I fixed one minor error in one reference
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * no trivia; focused
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * no bias
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * as semi-protected
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * high-quality pictures are properly licensed
 * 1) Overall: I see you are a WikiCup entrant, and you have only 10 points :/. Sorry for the delay, I was busy, but also a bit lazy :).
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No worries on the Wikicup. If I was truly dedicated to it this year, I'dve had several articles queued up.  Appreciate the review, and hopefully I have addressed your concerns.  Thanks! Resolute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries on the Wikicup. If I was truly dedicated to it this year, I'dve had several articles queued up.  Appreciate the review, and hopefully I have addressed your concerns.  Thanks! Resolute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)