Talk:Michael E. Horowitz

When was he appointed as Inspector General?
Current article appears to be a rather uninformative stub, but the answer I was looking for is when he became Inspector General. Shanen (talk) 09:42, 18 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The Info Box to the right states: "Assumed office – April 16, 2012". Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:42, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2019
Please remove "However, Christopher Steele, the British ex-spy was reported to be a friend of Donald's Trump eldest daughter, Ivanka, for several years by several news organizations, and Ivanka met with Steele about employing him to do work for the Trump Organization, so apparently if Steele was bias he probably was in favor of Trump, not against him, but Steele states that in his line of business being bias in favor of anyone would damage the reputation of his information gathering business." from article/section as it is not pertinent or informative to the subject. I appears to be a biased addition in retaliation to the criticism of the validity of the Steele dossier, as well as the damaging findings of IG Horowitz's report. The subject of this addition is Christopher Steele, makes no connection to Michael Horowitz, and therefore has no place in this article. Qrisjin (talk) 20:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template. Interstellarity (talk) 00:11, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I removed it because it has nothing, or very little, to do with this person's biography. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Where is the article for the December 9, 2019, IG report
We have this tiny section:


 * #Findings of FBI investigation of Russia and Trump

So where's the main article based on this "Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Investigation"? -- BullRangifer (talk) 03:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Discussion related to new (12:38, 30 December 2019, then  edited) Inspector General report on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation article?  X1\ (talk) 23:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Good. -- BullRangifer (talk) 23:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Review of FISA applications, will need work on wording; add here &/or ... ?
The DoJ IG found errors in FBI applications to conduct secret surveillance. Horowitz reviewed 29 FISA applications — submitted between October 2014 and September 2019 — and found problems with all of them. The office said it found an average of about 20 issues per application, including one application with about 65 issues. Also see Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia (2019–2020). X1\ (talk) 06:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/fbi-surveillance-trump-russia-inspector-general/2020/03/31/22274dd0-735c-11ea-a9bd-9f8b593300d0_story.html
 * https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/31/us/politics/fbi-fisa-wiretap-trump.html
 * Eric Tucker Watchdog finds new problems with FBI wiretap applications April 1, 2020 Associated Press
 * Pete Williams ''FBI was not careful enough in seeking secret surveillance, review finds; The audit of 29 FISA applications showed a lack of compliance with the requirement that factual allegations be properly documented, the DOJ inspector general said. March 31, 2020 NBC News
 * Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney Justice Department audit finds widespread flaws in FBI surveillance applications; The finding by Inspector General Michael Horowitz came after an earlier inquiry found numerous errors in court submissions seeking surveillance of a former Trump campaign adviser. March 31, 2020 Politico

Familiy background
Why is there no mention of his and his wife's Israeli family background? - http://aronoff.com/fam9629.html

Note that Investigation report could follow
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ig-probe-fbi-retaliated-jan-6-capitol-protest

Michael Horowitz, the inspector general of the Department of Justice, told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and Ranking Member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, that he would consider launching an investigation into whether the FBI retaliated against agents who attended the Jan. 6, 2021, protest at the U.S. Capitol but who did not enter the building with rioters.

Jordan, citing FBI whistleblowers, urged Horowitz last month to investigate whistleblower claims that "the FBI is suspending the security clearances of FBI employees for their participation in protected First Amendment activity on January 6, 2021." Since a security clearance is required for FBI positions, "these actions mean the FBI has suspended these employees indefinitely."

Horowitz, in a May 4 letter obtained first by Fox News Digital, stopped short of pledging to launch an investigation into the issue, but he did say he would reach out to the FBI and consider whether to open an investigation. "In view of the concern you have raised, we will ask the FBI to provide the bases for the security clearance and personnel actions taken against the employees you reference in your letter," Horowitz said in his letter Wednesday. "Based on the information we receive, we will assess whether to conduct a further review." "In making such an assessment, we will also consider information about other employees who believe the FBI has taken administrative actions against them for engaging in protected activities on January 6, 2021," Horowitz added. 2601:19B:A00:9030:D066:2AF1:477C:7C13 (talk) 16:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * So insurrection and illegal interference in the proper transfer of power against the will of the people are "protected activities"? We need more context, so please provide reliable sources for this information. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the source. Per long and unfortunate experience with the deceptive and misinformative nature of Fox News' coverage of American politics, conspiracy theories, and science topics (especially climate change denial, Vaccine hesitancy and COVID19), the community has determined that Fox News is not a reliable source for politics and science topics. See WP:RSP. We prefer better sources, so if there is coverage of this in such sources, please provide them. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)