Talk:Michael Ford

-

Untitled
This talk page should not redirect to Talk:Michael Gerald Ford, it should be separate, unless there is a good reason for redirection. --83.131.17.100 10:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

It may have been an accident, it doesn't redirect for me. Jjmillerhistorian 16:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Now it doesn't redirect, but this version did. --89.172.253.132 17:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I'll try and avoid that mistake next time. It looks like it is all fixed now. Jjmillerhistorian 12:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Why is 'Michael W. Ford' notable?
I see from his Myspace page that he is/was a musician and has written 2 books. But other than that I don't see much that is notable. Being a "follower" of a religion is not notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Otherwise there would be 6 billion pages just for all the people. You should give some references here for people to discuss. Pgc512 02:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * He wrote more than just two books as it can be seen here, and there is an article on Wikipedia about Liber HVHI, one of his books, so he is notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. And he is also musician. --83.131.17.100 09:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The "lulu" reference you give was written by his publisher to promote him and his books. The Liber HVHI article was mostly written by you.  Pgc512 13:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Should we be thinking about a page for the Bristolian idiot amateur journalist known as Mike Ford
He may not be very good as a journalist, but he is probably better known to more people in the Bristol metropolitan area than some of these other Mike Fords are known throughout the world. Just a thought. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.222.130.96 (talk) 13:46, 30 October 2009 (UTC)