Talk:Michael Gough (cricketer)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Gough (cricketer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150330201852/http://www.icc-cricket.com/news/2014/media-releases/83319/icc-announces-match-officials-for-icc-cricket-world-cup-2015 to http://www.icc-cricket.com/news/2014/media-releases/83319/icc-announces-match-officials-for-icc-cricket-world-cup-2015

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Frequent Vandalism
This article is currently facing frequent vandalism due to a recent incident. Should this be semi-protected? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pauras Ranade (talk • contribs) 11:00, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * It's logged at WP:RFPP and WP:ANI, so hopefully it'll calm down soon.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 11:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 June 2019
He don't like Indian crickets so specially and specifically Rohit Sharma 157.39.224.105 (talk) 15:06, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * ❌. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 16:18, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Controversial Decision of Rohit Sharma
Reason why this is worth noting. 1. This decision is taken through DRS. on-field umpire's wrong decision may be acceptable. 2. He changed the Decision of on-field umpire without surety.

many other umpire's Wikipedia pages consist this type of content. --Anandjpanchal (talk) 04:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)


 * One bad decision that had zero impact on the game isn't really worth noting. If it was in the final, and it cost the side the trophy, then maybe it would be worth adding. I'll raise this at the Cricket Project for more input.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 09:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Have a read of Referee/Criticism. Umpires make 1,000s of decisions, some may be borderline or even outright wrong, but we don't need to mention them here unless they are clearly worthy of note. Spike &#39;em (talk) 10:37, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Clearly not worth covering on the article - it's a single incident in a long career and ultimately inconsequential. The whole shebang is daft. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Clearly not worth noting. Why? Because bad decisions happen all the time. Has this or will this have any lasting consequences beyond the WC? No. StickyWicket (talk) 15:37, 30 June 2019 (UTC)