Talk:Michael Hagemeister

Yours truly,--Ludvikus 05:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Ovladenie vremenem
A question has been raised as to the ISBN of the above title. I give the following 2 titles from the WEB as follows:

Murav'ev, Valerian Nikolaevic Nachdr. d. Ausg. Moskva 1924 / nebst e. einführenden Studie von Michael Hagemeister. München. Sagner. 1983. 27, 127 S.. Specimina philologiae slavicae ; 051. ISBN 3-87690-231-2
 * Ovladenie vremenem

Murav½ev, Valerian NikolaeviÏc ; Aksenov, G.P. Moskva. ROSSPÇEN. 1998. 318 S.. Filosofy Rossii XX veka. ISBN 5-86004-146-2
 * Ovladenie vremenem: [izbrannye filosofskie i publicistiÏceskie proizvedenija]

Yours truly, --Ludvikus 21:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The article has the following:

* Ovladenie vremenem

[ed.] Michael Hagemeister (Munchen: O. Sager, 1983) ISBN 3-87690-232-1

There is clearly a flip in the last 2 digits of the ISBN. I'll correct it forthwith. --Ludvikus 22:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Useless link
I removed this useless/inaccessible link:
 * Michael Kutuzov-Tolstoy, The Story of my Life, Preface by Michael Hagemeister . --Ludvikus (talk) 21:23, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Hagemeister's recent writing on the authorship of the PSM
Here's the scoop: --Ludvikus (talk) 18:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Professorships
As I understand it, he was hired temporarily (probably as full professor) while the Chair was away or while the search for a new Chair was ongoing. This kind of temporary full professorships (Lehrstuhlvertretung) is quite common in Germany (somebody has to do the teaching during the 1-3 years it typically takes to fill a position). —Kusma (t·c) 18:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)


 * OK. Temporary professor might be better wording. Any idea of what his current situation is (from those 2 CV's at the bottom of the page)? Professor, visiting scholar, researcher or what?Guccisamsclubs (talk) 19:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you ever feel like it, please come back to the page and add some info about Hagemeister's two most recent positions. I don't know German and don;t want to rely on google translate lest I make an error in a BLP. thanks Guccisamsclubs (talk) 21:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Sources on academic weight of Hagemeister
Are there any better sources on the academic 'authority' of Hagemeister as regards the PEZ and Nilus than what are currently given? From what I've read, he does appear rather prolific in his research and his considerations of the claim of forgery in France, with commentary on Nilus being relevant as regards that. However, as regards his wider academic import, the main sources currently given here are a single paper on Russian immigrants' supposed influences on National Socialism in which his work is mentioned; A review of this same paper; And a paper on Serafim of Sarov (Which I have admittedly not read in its entirety) in which he is mentioned solely in footnotes, and where his standing is not actually written about. Other than this, there is the other source of Richard Levy, not given in the introduction to the article, which does call him a 'leading authority'. But the current form of the article seems to simply be a modified format of its original stub, in which he is referred to as the 'foremost authority' on the PEZ and Nilus without any sources, with some very peripheral citations attached to a revised form of this statement. More direct sources, then, ought to be given in the introductory part, and the citations throughout the article should generally be improved. Zusty001 (talk) 14:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)