Talk:Michael Horodniceanu

Why? Why this article, and'why' articles such as this?
Dr. Michael Horodniceanu is simply a (typical) NYC government employee.

This Wikipedia page does/says nothing which can't be found in a typical bio/cv available on a (typical) gov't page.

The information - or, more accurately, the dearth of it, shows why such a page is superfluous.

Though a 'page' in cyberspace is an inexhaustible resource, it doesn't-mean that anyone who's been in a newspaper, or such is deserving, and/or needing of one.

The number of pages like this - people of little, if any consequence - is staggering, and what's even worse - the 'powers that be' here are quick as possible to handle, remove, notice, (what is, in comparison) nonsense, whereas to get a page (such as this) removed seems slower than the retreat of the glaciers of the last ice age.

It's as if by ignorance, and slothfulness, either people will forget its existence, or, they'll just die-off.

It's ridiculous!

There should be a better, faster way to remove a page such as this. There should be some common sense criteria an article should meet, a '10-point checklist' of 'relevancy'. If an article in question doesn't meet it, and either receives a specific number of votes, (or, based on a statistically proportionate number) by a certain (realistic) date, it should be either removed - immediately, or should be (1) reworked, and (2) if it still seems to be questionable, re-voted. And this process can be done - let's say up to 3 times, and after that - if after 3 votes, and 3 rewrites, it still seems 'hinky', it should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UNOwenNYC (talk • contribs)
 * Why not?!? --Vlad|-> 19:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Notability is a broad concept. The article should be edited to a concise level but he did get a NY Times obit and that says something about a lot of Wikipedia bios. I vote to keep it. I will address the primary sources problem with the NY times material and others. ENR is a reputable publication.
 * Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 13:10, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
 * He was extremely influential and left his mark on much of the city. He personally oversaw the construction of several subway lines, and prior to that, had many roles in city government. Test35965 (talk) 01:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michael Horodniceanu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150610070117/http://honestbuildingssummit.com/speakers/michael-horodniceanu/ to http://honestbuildingssummit.com/speakers/michael-horodniceanu/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150610070004/http://a856-gbol.nyc.gov/gbolwebsite/323.html to http://a856-gbol.nyc.gov/gbolwebsite/323.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:00, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest Disclosure
As a retired public agency employee (Federal Department of Transportation) and "unpaid" Wikipedia editor, I have a conflict of interest in writing about some agency programs such as those of the NYC MTA. I also possess significant knowledge and experience with Federal and MTA agency operations, and I wish to edit responsibly. Therefore, I will follow Wikipedia policies and best practices scrupulously. I will be disclosing my interest on their user pages and on the talk page of the article in question, and request the views of other editors, and if necessary, I will make suggestions on the relevant talk page.

Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 13:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)