Talk:Michael J. Murphy (builder)

Tenant information
I've gone through and removed name specific tenant mentions in building articles listed under this page, but left behind generic description such as "retail". I do not see the encyclopedic value of including a URL to or having a tenant list when the basis of notability is for building's historic nature. Graywalls (talk) 09:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for pointing this out. I did not realize it was not a good idea to say what the current status of the building is. Greg Henderson (talk) 16:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * , this note was from, not me, although I have also removed numerous urls from unfoboxes on such articles. The issue is not with the "current status" of the building, but the linking to commercial websites of tenants in an article about a building - the infobox parameter should only ever be used for the website of the subject of the article - or other forms of promoting contemporary businesses. Melcous (talk) 20:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing this out. Greg Henderson (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)