Talk:Michael J. S. Dewar

Untitled
This writer has a direct interest in the subject matter and thus someone else should be involved. But do let me mention that the Zimmerman reference details the contributions of Dewar and also of Evans. The Evans article reveals that all Evans presented was the 6-electron Hueckel case of a Diels-Alder. He had no Moebius (Dewar's "Anti-Hueckel") idea. Thus the Zimmerman article documents the development of the M-H idea and Dewar's contributions and Dewar's re-writing history, ascribing to Evans what Evans had not published. And Dewar's changing claims with time. The reference is interesting reading if nothing else; it is below. The Tetrahedron Editor was a student of Dewar and asked that the article be less forthright. But the article was accepted since it was accurate.

REFERENCES:

"Möbius and Hückel Systems in the SCF and CI Approximations," Zimmerman, H. E. Tetrahedron, 1982, 38, 753-758. M:G. Evans and E. Warhurst, Trans. Faraday Soc., 34,614 (1938); M. G. Evans. bid.. 35. 824 (1939).

Howard E. Zimmerman 16:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

I moved this from article to here. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  14:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael J. S. Dewar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051116043658/http://neon.cm.utexas.edu/faculty/Dewar.html to http://neon.cm.utexas.edu/faculty/Dewar.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)