Talk:Michael J Hannafin

Not a CV
This version of the article had the character of a curriculum vitae, and was in fact largely sourced from the subject's résumé. It was written by Antheat17, a single-purpose account, so I expect that there was a conflict of interest.

I've also removed the discussion of the Hannafin-Peck model. It was a stock-standard diagram saying to assess needs, design the course and implement; evaluating and revising along the way. That's not worth a section.

I guess Prof. Hannafin meets WP:PROF, but the article is marginal at best, even after cleanup, and needs more third-party sources. --Slashme (talk) 10:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)