Talk:Michael Lynk

Antisémitisme
Antisémitisme de souche ; en Palestine qu'elle est la loi ? la Charia. Quel génie ce libanais écossais etc., perdu lui même entre chrétien d'orient (c'est dire), protestant et musulman, les 3 religions filles occidentalisées et incapables "d'envisager" l'hébreu biblique, entre ces 3 filles du même acabit, reniant la mère : mon antisémitisme balance. 4000 ans que les chiens aboient et que les prix Nobel passent. 109.18.0.58 (talk) 02:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Need more information
Michael Lynk is frequently interviewed by Al Jazeera during the 2023 Hamas War. He claims that Israel can't strike a civilian venue used by Hamas to strike Israel if the Hamas operative is surrounded by a "disproportionate" amount of civilians as human shields. So I believe he's saying if Hamas had a massive weapon fired from a hospital that would result in massive Israeli casualties, the hospital is fair game. But if Hamas chooses to fire a rocket that can only kill 1-5 civilians at a time, Israel can only strike Hamas with a weapon that kills a "proportionate" amount of people. In this way, Hamas has legally set itself up to be undefeatable via human shields.

I noticed this page is a stub when it comes to highlighting what the complaints about him were, yet has many quotes from his defenders.

UNWatch has a lot of points of criticism. 1.129.107.252 (talk) 23:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Proportionality (law) may be the page linked to this that most needs expanding. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)