Talk:Michael Mandiberg/Archive 1

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Mandiberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140220043932/http://centerforthehumanities.org/james-gallery/events/Experiments-in-Extra-Institutional-Education to http://centerforthehumanities.org/james-gallery/events/Experiments-in-Extra-Institutional-Education

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Tag
Please give a specific reason for the tag, or identify specifically problematic text within the article. We don't need to add a tag just because. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I've removed the tag again. Please stop adding just because. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

The article was created and mostly written by user drinthego a blase article collaborator of Mandinberg's and likely to the subject's specifications who is using Wikipedia for their own purposes. It is clear that a major contributor to this article has a close personal connection to the subject.Shroudymeatballs (talk) 22:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

You prove that there is not a COI you began by reverting my edit, the burden of proof is on youShroudymeatballs (talk) 22:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , No, YOU need to identify specifically problematic content. Keep this up and I'll be reporting you to admins. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Why have you added the COI tag? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Never mind? I'm confused... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Excuse me I was reading the arguement and agreeing but can see that no real proof was offeredWilliamsdoritios (talk) 23:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@anotherbeliever ok you are correct there is not enough evidence right nowShroudymeatballs (talk) 23:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Editors have been blocked; closing this discussion. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)