Talk:Michael U. Gisriel

Edit warring with Mdpoly5
I am perfectly satisfied with the reversion of the article to its previous version. Neither Mdpoly5 nor MDLobby51 have ever edited anything on Wikipedia other than this article, and their edits have consistently sought to portray the subject as an attorney (which he manifestly no longer is), and to remove all reference to his disbarment. Coincidentally or not, the subject of the article is a Maryland lobbyist who was born in 1951.

I apologize for engaging in an edit war, which I have never done before, but I think it is important that the well-documented information about the subject's disbarment should be included in the article, and that the subject not be referred to as an attorney. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leevank (talk • contribs) 22:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

New edits by Bunnybug33
Not surprisingly, a new editor who had never before edited a Wikipedia article shows up to delete all references to the subject's disbarment. This time, he also makes a couple of very minor edits to other articles within minutes of this one. At this point, this seems to be vandalism, and a deliberate attempt to prevent this article from referencing the well-documented fact of the subject's disbarment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leevank (talk • contribs) 00:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Page protection
Due to the continued edit-warring I've fully protected the article for one month. Details of the protection can be found at WP:FPP. Discuss any requested changes here! —S MALL JIM   19:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)