Talk:Michael Yon/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

On hold whilst above concerns are addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Ref #26 is a dead link; ✅
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * I note that he has been in conflict with the US military and others. I feel balance would be served by including some detailed criticism. ✅
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * I tried to address both issues. I'm wary of putting any more critical views into the article as it is right now since I don't want to give them undue weight (and this is a BLP, after all). The Squicks (talk) 03:20, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I understand your concerns and appreciate the efforts that you have made. I am now happy to pass this as a {{WPGood Article|Good Article]].  Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:55, 26 October 2009 (UTC)