Talk:Michael Zehaf-Bibeau

Untitled
Do we really need a separate article about him here, which consists of only a bare stub that contains not a single piece of information that isn't already in the main article on the incident (and since he's dead, never ever will contain a single piece of information that couldn't just be added to the main article on the incident)? Bearcat (talk) 23:49, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The current press coverage is evolving to discuss his life that occurred before the event. Items that occurred before the event are more appropriate to a separate page than the event itself. Jeremy112233 ( Lettuce-jibber-jabber? ) 00:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Nothing here that cannot be included in main article. No need at this time for a breakout article. WWGB (talk) 00:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Whatevs, I'm more concerned about historicizing the actual harm being done, rather than participating petty Wikipedia arguments. Jeremy112233 ( Lettuce-jibber-jabber? ) 00:58, 23 October 2014 (UTC)