Talk:Michele Soavi

==Notice: This article lacks WP:A to establish == In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Untitled
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.— Triwbe (talk) 08:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It is unfortunate that you tried to get his deleted rather than spending a few minutes looking for references with which to improve it, which were not hard to find. I would suggest that in future if you're short of time, that you wait until you at least have the time to do a little research before tagging articles with plenty of assertion of notability for deletion, as they can very easily get deleted before interested editors realise that they've been tagged.--Michig (talk) 13:01, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Category:Flagged articles
I have removed the  from the message above . it was flagged at least two months ago by Some Other Editor, but the current version looks OK to me. Avic enna sis @ 06:35, 8 April 2010 (UTC)