Talk:Michelin

tire vs tyre
so why do people keep editing it from tire to tyre 2607:FEA8:29E3:8A00:54B7:DAF3:B212:1D8D (talk) 19:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * As noted in the box immediately above this section, this article is written in British English and "tyre" is how the word is spelled in British English. See WP:ENGVAR for further information. DH85868993 (talk) 09:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Merger discussion
I am proposing to merge ViaMichelin into this article. FactFindersEnigma (talk) 15:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @FactFindersEnigma i agree Gerçois (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * This would seem to work as a subsection under michelin much better than an independent article Geardona (talk) 15:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I disagree with the idea that ViaMichelin should be merged with Michelin. None of the other subsidiaries of Michelin have been merged with the main page, so it seems perfectly fine to leave ViaMichelin with its own page on Wikipedia. Also, there is already a subsection on the Michelin page called "Online mapping" that includes a summary of (and link to) the ViaMichelin page. RBRust (talk) 00:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Support merging But I will not cry when the article goes to AfD as ViaMichelin looks like promo. The Banner  talk 10:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Oppose. ViaMichelin satisfies GNG easily and by a wide margin. It has received significant coverage in many books and periodicals, including many entire articles about it. In addition to the sources added to the article today, there is more coverage in Google Books, in the Internet Archive, and in newpapers etc. The article is not promotional, and now actually includes negative criticism from reliable newspapers, and cites negative critical reviews in reliable publications. James500 (talk) 14:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)