Talk:Michelle Bell/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jonahman10 (talk · contribs) 01:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

I am Jonahman10, and I am happy to give more advice on how to improve the article. Thanks for everybody's work on creating this article, but I'm afraid this article does not meet Wikipedia's Good Article Standards.

This article requires much more attention before it reaches the Good Article criteria,but the largest problem is the small scope of the article. In order to reach Good Article Standards, you need more than a small biographical, a works, and a reception section. Information on her life, such as personal and family relationships are also very important.

The biography section could be improved by including essential data such as where and when she was born. Other important information would be her college attendance. In general, just add more in depth information. There were also a few grammatical errors which I corrected. Much of the information given is in the form of quotes, but would be more effectively given in sentences.

While the "critical reception" section is sufficiently developed, the title is misleading; instead of implying that there were critics reviewing her work, it implied that many people viewed her work harshly. I simply abbreviated the title to "Reception", which will allow it to be combined with actual sales numbers.

The article is sourced extremely well, however there appears to be an error with Source 37.

The infobox is incomplete, this infobox helps to organize the article and gives a brief reference to their biographical data.

Seeing that she is living, it shouldn't be impossible to acquire a photo of her. Though be sure that if an image is added that it does not violate any copyright laws.

Once all of these things are addressed, please resubmit the article for GA nomination.

Jonahman10 (talk) 01:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)