Talk:Michigan Women's Hall of Fame/Archive 1

Redundancy
Seems a bit redundant to have both an alphabetical list and a chronological one. D-Rock 00:30, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Hmm. I felt that having both would make it easier to reference the inductees individually and also to study each year's inductees. The MWHF website doesn't have a yearly reference and doesn't offer sorting by year inducted. If I was going to have to get rid of one table, I would have to remove the alphabetical list, so that the wikipedia entry offers something that the website does not. This entry is also currently outdated, there have been one or two induction ceremonies since I stopped working on it. And there are several inductees who do not have wikipedia entries, at all. Are you involved with wikiproject Michigan (I'm not)? Gabriel Arthur Petrie 17:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

(The issue of table redundancy has been addressed by BKonrad who put the tables together in a column-sortable fashion.) Gabriel Arthur Petrie 19:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)