Talk:MicroSIP

Lets remove the maintenance header
for nine years this article has head an ugly maintenance header. It complains of 2 things:

- too much reliance on primary sources. Well - that is normal with product articles, especially in the context of open source. The New York Times rarely writes articles about obscure open source projects Amf over the last 10 years - lack of notability. Well, despite his concerns the author was not willing to actually to do an RfD, so I presume he - like me - thought he is likely wrong with this.

The maintenance template was added at the day of the article's creation. I conclude the issues have been addressed since.

I propose to remove the template, and, barring serious objections, intend to do so. Wefa (talk) 17:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)