Talk:Micro Maxx

Why was the proposal for deletion removed? statsone 00:47, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It googles pretty well and seems to be one of the leading products in its field. It's not too easy to find independent third-party coverage, at least for an amateur like me, but there's at least thisDiscover magazine review. Kappa 02:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Looks like it could be merged with Quest Aerospace. Kappa 02:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Old 2002 article. Better to just merge the two. statsone 02:56, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I disagree, I think that each product for every company should have its own article. Remember, Wikipedia is not paper. --ForbiddenWord 14:47, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * On the same page of not paper, "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information." It is too general a statement to say every product for every company should have its own page. statsone 15:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Even so, who is to draw the line and say that "X is not appropriate to include"? As long as the claim can be verified that it is a product made for sale by a company, it is hardly indiscriminate. --ForbiddenWord 15:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)