Talk:Microbial electrolysis carbon capture

Likely, it will not be its own page but an additional section of microbial electrosynthesis or microbial fuel cell and one more long one page that goes in depth about the microbial fuel cells.

Description: Using wastewater as a means to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere, or as a carbon sink. This idea incorporates the effects of.... ChambaKikii (talk) 09:00, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

This article now has a lead section. ChambaKikii (talk) 02:27, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

ChambaKikii Peer Review
Lead section: Lead section is easy to understand and clear.

Structure: Structure of the page is a little bit unclear. Formatting is not consistent, eg some parts without proper paragraphing. In addition table of contents that is in the article does not seem to correlated with the details/information in the article.

Balanced coverage: Expected coverage of content as shown in the table of contents is sufficient, however there is no information on some parts of it.

Neutral content: Content is reported in a neutral tone. Only facts and figures are given without any personal bias.

Sources: Sources provided are reliable. These sources are based on accurate reports with credible citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gsng002 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

"Response" Thank you- Removed the bullet point structure to make room for the article. Will have time to add a balanced coverage of content by Wed Dec. 5. ChambaKikii (talk) 09:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

santosojonathan's Peer Review
Still early minor review, replaced all '2's in CO2 to its proper subscript form. I'll review on more parts soon. Santosojonathan (talk) 20:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
I think you are off to a good start with your article draft. You have the essential content and provide an unbiased introduction into MECC’s. As you start on your next draft, I think a strong lead in would be helpful with a little more information on the background of MECC’s and the overall topic of your page. Even a single statement about the significance of MECC’s and the benefits of carbon capture would be helpful to make the role of MECC’s clear for someone less familiar with the topic. Because it is a specialized topic, changing a few of the sentences with more content into 2 or more sentences would be helpful for someone using your page as an introduction to meccs. In terms of balance, you might consider either adding more to the background/summary/technology of MECC’s so it balances out the economics section. Or, you might reduce the amount of content on economics so it is balanced with the previous paragraphs. You have a good diversity of sources from different areas. Overall, I think the content in your page has a clear structure and sets you up well as you begin to edit and work towards your final draft. Aeb1995 (talk) 23:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Balanced Overall Equation?
I just rearranged the technology description section, but the overall chemistry still isn't 100% clear to me--in particular "silicate" seems to mean some sort of mineral, likely calcium silicate. It'd be nice if somebody with access to the ACS paper could write up an overall chemical equation, ideally both as an overall reaction and as the half-reactions at the anode and cathode. Olawlor (talk) 03:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)