Talk:Microsoft Word

Very opinionated comments in this article
There are numerous sections here that read like a diatribe, with no sources given and very opinionated comments. This is particularly true in "Layout Issues" and "Issues with Technical Documents." I recommend the sections be rewritten to have a more NPOV. Andacar (talk) 03:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The Layout Issues paragraph is also outdated from my point of view. It describes problems of pre-2010-versions, which are not interesting to the Wikipedia reader.
 * The paragraph Issues with Technical Documents really reads like a revenge edit of an angry word user. It would need better sources, showing that the frustration is a widespread problem worth noting here.
 * I would suggest deleting both paragraphs. WikiBrendy (talk) 12:18, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I've added requests for citation to . It had one external link to a Microsoft Community forum post, which I turned into a reference. Guy Harris (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2023 (UTC)