Talk:Midday Meal Scheme/Archive 1

Redirection
I think the Mid Day Meals should redirect to Mid Day Meals Scheme and Not Lunch. "Mid Day Meals" in India is not equivalent to Lunch. Though you may be technically correct, I am afraid that your edit does not reflect the truth   Doctor Bruno    11:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I have addressed this point on my talk page. Please do not cross-post. Gaius Cornelius 13:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mgr33mmdla1R.jpg
Image:Mgr33mmdla1R.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Deleting Broken Link
I have deleted the broken link on "Nutrition and Health". Though it was a minor edit, i just want the people who are watching this wikipage to know that it has been deleted --Ankithreya (talk) 10:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Removed Naandi Foundation
There was a copied advertisement about the Naandi Foundation in its own section. I just removed it. Lots of organizations get government grants to implement this program and they all cannot be in this article. If a list of organizations is to be made then that would be fine, and on the articles for the specific organizations there can be info about how they participate. But any individual group's participation is not relevant - they are just implementing a government program and to put them here would be too advertising.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)   05:13, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Some edits and issues
So I decided I wanted to make some relatively minor copyediting edits and maybe tag some issues, and I ended up changing the section structure a bit. Mainly I consolidated the sections, making some formerly independent sections into subsections etc, and I also changed some of the wording which I found to be a bit un-neutral. I had the thought that, as a person with no significant knowledge of the actual content of the article, that I discuss this a bit first, but I like it much better this way, and I did not really change any content. Anyway, I thought it would just be polite to put this up here in case anyone wants to say anything. anamedperson (talk) 07:32, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Use of names of cities
I have reverted back Mumbai to Bombay ,as in 1942 it was Bombay and not Mumbai. Keri, Please correct me if my side of argument is wrong. Commons sibi (talk) 12:45, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * No, no, that's fine, you are correct. But while I have your attention, would you please take note of Bare URLs and try to avoid using just the url as a reference? Appreciated. Keri (talk) 12:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure, I will take care of it and will start using the full citation from now on , about which I was not fully aware before . Thanks for the guidance .Commons sibi (talk) 13:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Advertisement type of edits
In the private sector participation of the article, the users are trying to add specific names of NGO with intent of advertisement , without providing valid references. That could to be avoided.Commons sibi (talk) 17:21, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

removed the Refimprove while retaining the Copy edit
Removed the Refimprove while retaining the Copy edit. If still editors feel that the Refimprove need to be present, please feel free to add it. Commons sibi (talk) 10:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:18, 25 June 2014 (UTC)