Talk:Midwestern University/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: InterestGather (talk · contribs) 21:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Passed after some simple corrections, issues generally related to unnecessary commas and unnecessary spaces added after periods.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Occasional original research, I have cleaned it up.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Numerous occasions of unnecessary topics in unrelated sections, one example includes the mention of "no criminal arrests" on the Glendale campus in an unrelated campus. I have corrected this.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Previous edit wars, however due to the decent time passed since their occurrence (over 2 years) I do not believe it is unreasonable to say the conflict has concluded.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * After some necessary corrections, the article fits all six good article criteria, does not meet the immediate fail criteria and therefor will be pushed forward.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * After some necessary corrections, the article fits all six good article criteria, does not meet the immediate fail criteria and therefor will be pushed forward.