Talk:Mihail Kogălniceanu/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 21:55, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: One found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:58, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: Two found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The prose is reasonably good, complies sufficiently with the Manual of Style. I made a number of minor copy-edits for grammar and clarity.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Adequately cited, sources appear RS, no RS, assume good faith for Romanian and off-line sources, spotchecks OK.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough coverage
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images correctly licensed and captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * THis meets the GA criteria, so I am happy to list it. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Jez, thank you for your beautiful and clearly needed copyedit, not to mention the trouble you took verifying the article bit by bit. I also want to thank Ionutz for having nominated it. Dahn (talk) 07:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC)