Talk:Mihailo Obrenović, Prince of Serbia

Requested move 17 April 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Material  Works   (contribs)  18:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Mihailo Obrenović → Mihailo Obrenović, Prince of Serbia – The main reason motivating this proposed move is establishing a consistency in article titles that cover ruling Princes of Serbia. A few weeks ago, this page and Miloš Obrenović, Prince of Serbia were the only pages that did not conform to this format. The page for Miloš Obrenović was recently moved to the current format after a proposed move discussion and the resulting article name was one that the editors either explicitly agreed on, were willing to accept or addressed their opposing thoughts. One editor explicitly proposed addressing this page should the page for Miloš Obrenović be moved the way it was ultimately agreed upon. I'd like to note that ruling Princes of Monaco, an existing principality, follow this format in page titles. Killuminator (talk) 16:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose, because titles should not be longer than they need to be. See WP:CONCISE, a part of our article titling policy. We do not have Barack Obama, President of the United States and so we should not have Mihailo Obrenović, Prince of Serbia either. Surtsicna (talk) 19:44, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Strong support per WP:SOVEREIGNS. Estar8806 (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per WP:SOVEREIGN and WP:CONSISTENCY with other Serbian princes. I don't think that "conciseness" is a virtue that should be regarded independently from the other four criteria, and we have specialized naming conventions that implement the broader consensus how the criteria should be weighed in a specific field. No such user (talk) 10:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)