Talk:Mikael Samuelsson/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kaiser matias (talk) 04:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments: *In lead mention what year he started playing in Sweden. Only a few minor issues, the biggest being the consistency with the numbers. Look forward to seeing the entire Canucks team being GA's; shouldn't be too much longer now. Kaiser matias (talk) 04:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * "scoring five goals and an assist in 18 games." Keep numbers consistent in cases like this, either all numerals or all words. This happens several times throughout the article.
 * In regards to his trade to the Panthers, I'd specify it happened at the draft.
 * There is no mention of his one game in Switzerland to start the 2005–06 season in the prose. From what it looks like, he started playing there before the Red Wings contacted him.
 * "He was joined on the club with with teammates and fellow Swedes Henrik Zetterberg and Niklas Kronwall." This should be rephrased. The Triple Gold Club isn't a exactly a club per se, but more of a feat.
 * Addressed all above issues. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Thanks for the review! Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 09:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Passed