Talk:Mike Cervenak

Deleted Tags
I think that this article is way to choppy, and thus I tagged it. There are 6 sub-sections in the playing career category, but each one only has about 5 lines. They should either be expanded or condensed. If they all can be expanded and referenced then terrific, but otherwise, I think the section should be condensed. Upon further review, it's well enough referenced, but I still think condensation of the article is warranted Go Phightins! (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Condensation is no problem. I did take exception at the implication of poor referencing because I worked hard to get this article up to DYK snuff. I don't think that any of the content needs to be removed, it can just be sliced down under larger headings. I'll try and tackle it. &mdash; KV5  •  Talk  •  00:43, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I didn't mean to be brusque. I didn't know why I tagged the poor ref. one after I re-read the article...sorry about that. But nice job working on this article. Go Phightins! (talk) 00:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks for your vigilance, and keep up the good work. &mdash; KV5  •  Talk  •  21:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)